[warning: rant]
What a great post
I’ve really enjoyed it, especially since I was one of those who couldn’t find meaning in a degree (i was already running a business) despite attending a top uni, enrolled in advanced courses, pre-law, pre-med, class president, blah, blah, blah. result: i never got my degree … but am now (thanks to EL) heading back to get my phd in drum roll education! LOL
why? well, the system needs to be reformed, clearly. and i figure it’s easier to do once you’re ‘in’ the system, especially since realizing that the masses really equate letters behind one’s name to credibility! granted, i can get my kids to bypass our wonderful educational system by having them go the early-admission-cc-to-4-yr-uni route with a masters by the time their peers are finishing up high school (yes, i had this plan/goal set since last spring, including considering online classes at the cc in case i feel that they’re ‘too young’ to be left on the campus alone 8) btw: colleges are starting to put minimum age limits here!), but that still leaves my kids living in a country with peers who were severely failed. and somehow, to me, not doing something about it means that i’m failing my kids, too.
as adults, my children shouldn’t be content throttling in their communities or have to join up with ‘strangers’ across the globe (as we do on this forum) to find stimulating conversation. i feel that i should be able to engage in thought-provoking dialogue with anyone in my community (at the grocery store, at the mall, in an elevator), yet society has trained me to steer away from such until i’m certain that 1) said person is capable of thought beyond the basics, and 2) offenses won’t be taken, as may be the case for someone not taught to develop a position, defend the position, and openly reflect on changing one’s position if presented with new information. although i think my kids should be capable of discussing common topics, peer dialogue should not be limited to fashion, tv, sports, and work. nor should the bar of their passions (determined by education/experiences) be set so low that they find little significance in their existence (or worse yet, that they don’t even reflect on it!).
not only that, i am one of those ‘one person can change the world’ sort of people. where would humanity be without people straying from the social herd and thinking they could make a positive difference? and while i can garner merit from you bringing your kid to reality, possibly to keep him grounded in the worth of everyone and engaged within his surrounding social structure; i respectfully cringe at my interpretation of you drilling into your child that he isn’t brilliant. i do believe that relating to our peers is crucial. after all, what’s the point of having something to say/contribute, if no one is willing to listen/accept what you have to offer? interestingly, your proof is in the pudding. and the pudding gave you an 11! i don’t think it gets much better than that :biggrin: and at the risk of embarrassing him, i find it adorable that he came on here to check in and offer you his opinion. (by the way - i doubt i’m the only one who would LOVE to get his take on some el questions too!).
rant aside (no offense intended!), i would love to see more kids exposed to accelerated learning. so many, in fact, that it is no longer considered accelerated and just becomes the norm. why? because we’re all capable of it! in earlier posts, children with learning challenges were mentioned, but there are people who have successfully taught down syndrome, autistic, and other ‘challenged’ children to do more than the ‘average’ us student is doing in public schools right now.
i think about a problem arising that could negatively impact my ability to enjoy life with my kids - worst cases: illness, war, natural (more than likely human-inflicted and preventable) disaster. and then i think about how many people exist who can help prevent it. my sad reality is that our current system is failing all of us by not producing better thinkers, problem solvers, and people willing to contribute their findings. even worse, our nation, so far as i see it, is becoming more naive/ignorant with time, more apathetic to the problems that are being seen, and more incapable of correcting such grave errors, probably due to producing generations who are blind to critical thinking/problem solving. i see reading and math literacy as cures to this ailment, but without creating a system that supports early education, or at least the children that are a product of it, i feel that we have little hope of correcting this course to chaos. really, i can only speak on my experience here in va. this forum is international, but even within the us, each state has their own way of handling education. truthfully, even within the same school, each teacher has their own methods, which i have personally seen result in vast differences from classroom to classroom. so yeah, my two cents.
and as for whether i was offended by your comments: initially, yes, i was put off. but i kept reading and could clearly understand how your passion was fueled. i wholeheartedly agree that sight reading should not be practiced in elementary school, that phonics is key at that age. and i appreciated your acknowledging your lack of information on its application under age 4, as well as your ability to reason that it may work for that age group (it did for my kids :happy: ). anyway, thanks so much for sharing your points, and thank you so much for conscientiously raising a capable, confident, young man despite the social obstacles that you faced - the world definitely needs more of them!
i feel blessed each day for coming across this forum and its participants. i know that without them, my kids would be that much farther from reaching their natural potential. welcome, and feel free to share your opinions as they come. i might add that another failing of our current system seems to be in producing people who no longer know how to respectfully engage in friendly dialogue/debate. it seems that either people’s feelings get too hurt and they quit, or their feelings get too hurt and they start insulting or reacting violently. shame. the way i see it, conversation is meant to be engaging, stimulating, and with disagreement at times or else we’d be a nation of non-thinkers (oh wait, are we not there, yet?). we should get back to teaching actual rhetoric/philosophy in schools. where i live, i wouldn’t be surprised if the majority of the public school kids weren’t even familiar with the word. :-/ regardless, i very much appreciated your comments with all of their flavor, and do hope to read more from you thanks, again 