Manifesto of Very Early Education (version 1)

I have been “pre-homeschooling” my two boys, H. (almost five years) and E. (seven months). It has been an interesting journey. I have picked a few very general principles, which I thought it might help me–and perhaps other parents in similar situations–to write down. You might call this my credo, or manifesto. Feedback and pointers are welcome. If you want to disagree with a principle, and convince me otherwise, I’d love to have sources (such as books or essays) to convince me otherwise.

Basic principles

  1. Very small children are capable of learning much more than most people realize. When they do, they can benefit significantly for the rest of their lives.

  2. In the coming generation, societal awareness and acceptance of very early learning might well change on a massive scale. If it does, it will be because the Internet (I think of online videos of babies reading) makes it possible for people to bypass the institutions that, formerly, could make dissemination of information about this subject difficult.

  3. Those who dogmatically insist that play, and play only, is the work of childhood sadly misunderstand the virtues of early learning. Play might very well be the work of childhood–whatever that really means–but it is hardly inconsistent with significant early learning, which need not occupy much of your child’s “play” time. Besides, done right, learning feels like play.

  4. The education of very small children must be, above all, individualized. You must approach it with creativity, careful observation, and forethought, constantly adjusting what you do with your child.

  5. Reading to children is the most important component of any early learning program. Most of our academic knowledge can be gained from books. Those who are in favor of copious reading by parents to children are not, therefore, wholly opposed to early learning.

  6. Teaching young children can be viewed as a time-consuming, enjoyable hobby–probably the most rewarding and beneficial one you will ever have. Your old hobbies and interests can take a back seat for a while.

  7. Early exposure to facts and concepts, like early exposure to nursery rhymes and the language itself, makes them much easier to remember, relearn, and use later on.

  8. Flashcards, like presentations, handheld apps and old-fashioned concept books that teach the same things, can help teach huge numbers of basic concepts to little children. It is silly to dismiss them.

  9. Your main task in the hobby of early education is to delight your child with learning.

Attitude

  1. As much as you can, try to take a cheerful and positive approach toward learning, at all ages. Don’t treat learning as a chore; if you, the parent, approach it right, it can be lots of fun for the child.

  2. Do not force a child to learn, especially in the earliest years. If he resists, try another approach to the same subject, or change subjects.

  3. More positively stated, seek out those subjects, books, educational videos, and other educational tools that especially appeal to your child. There’s almost always something your child will be enthusiastic about. If you always focus on those, he’ll be constantly learning and still not get tired of it.

Study habits

  1. There is nothing wrong with trying to get a child to start on a regimen of learning of some kind (e.g., learning some subject, learning to read, a foreign language, music, etc.), but with little ones, it requires careful design and forethought, and your approach definitely should depend on the age of the child.

  2. Babies are easy. Most of them are happy to be exposed to anything new at any time. So you can pretty easily make your own schedule.

  3. With babies, be sure to stop a session when, or before, they start to look away from whatever you’re doing (book, video, whatever).

  4. Preschoolers are harder to manage than babies. At a certain age (around age two), they start having definite tastes and moods, and you must exercise all your powers of creativity, foresight, and patience–and sometimes, you must do some research or preparation in advance–if they are to continue to enjoy some subject.

  5. You do not, in fact, have to adopt anything like a schedule, or attempt to inculcate many habits, in order to teach your child a lot.

  6. If you do adopt a schedule, then you should always approach it flexibly. If your child is tired, disengaged, wants to do something else, etc., do not insist on doing something just because it’s on the schedule. Teach your child to tell you, “That’s enough,” or “I’m tired of this.”

  7. Be ready to take breaks from any type of educational activity, lasting days, weeks, or even months, when it becomes clear that your child needs the break.

Reading to children

  1. A fruitful way to think of early education is: reading a lot to your kids, much earlier than most people usually think of doing so.

  2. Two of the best times to read to children are at mealtime and at bedtime. This is because you have a “captive audience” and the children know that it’s time to sit still.

  3. If your child does not seem to want to read anything, you probably have not tried the right books. Especially past age two or so, children have definite tastes, and you must learn them if you want to read much to them.

  4. But children do go through phases where, for a few months, they are simply “cool” to the idea of books. That is fine; they are still game for other things. Try again in a few weeks.

  5. Classics are classics for a reason: they appeal to children. Yours will not like all classics, but they will probably like them in a much higher proportion than they like the average library or bookstore book.

  6. Easy versions of classics for older children often make excellent reading, and prepare children to appreciate the originals later on.

  7. Get well acquainted with the kinds and subjects of books for children. As there are age-appropriate books for children on almost any subject, especially after they are past the simplest picture books, there is no reason that you cannot introduce a child to almost any subject.

  8. I prefer to buy books over checking them out of the library (though we do both). This gives my little learners a greater interest due to the fact that we own the books, a resource to consult at will, and a sense of accomplishment as we look at bookcases filled with books we’ve read.

Early reading by children

  1. Babies can learn to start reading.

  2. Babies frequently like and even (when exposed to them appropriately) demand to be shown videos, flashcards, and other tools that teach them to read.

  3. Copious anecdotal evidence indicates that it is possible to start children learning to read at amazingly early age, and if you continue a gentle, positive program for a few years, they can be reading at amazingly high levels as preschoolers.

  4. Parents who say that their children mysteriously “taught themselves” to read have frequently done things that, unbeknownst to them, taught their children to read. It is possible to do similar things deliberately, and get the same results.

  5. The ability to learn to read at an early age does not require high intelligence.

  6. Expert criticism of early reading programs is based, ironically, in ignorance. I have yet to encounter a single expert who is both critical of baby reading and has significant experience with the phenomenon.

  7. There are several different methods of teaching little ones to read which can work. If you don’t like videos, or they seem ineffective with your child, or if you don’t like making paper flashcards, you can try another approach. Parents who have successfully taught their children to read early have frequently tried several approaches (not all at once, of course).

  8. Many people with early readers read a lot to their children, while moving their finger under the words. This should be the core of any method, whatever else is used.

  9. If your child seems stuck at the word-memorization stage, try presenting words in groups, based on phonetic relationships. You can effectively teach the rules of phonics, as I did to my son. (I explain how in my essay on early reading.)

Principles about subjects

  1. History is difficult to teach to very young children because they lack the concepts that enable them to understand, or care about, the stories that make up history. The best way to introduce history (apart from systematically introducing historical concepts, e.g., with flashcards) is to read the easiest sorts of history picture books, which explain even the simplest concepts.

  2. There is a remarkably large amount of basic information that very small children can be taught, and understand, about science. Most science learning should be supplemented with “hands on” experimentation; there are many excellent books that have “basic” experiments that even preschoolers can appreciate.

  3. However distasteful this may be to some educators, memorization of many math facts is key to true “math literacy.” Some such memorization can begin in early childhood; however, one should not expect small children to be able to understand very much of mathematics from an early age. They may catch on faster later, though.

  4. Some people successfully teach children foreign languages at an early age. It’s easy enough for children to learn their first language; at the same age, a second is not too hard. It’s important to remember, however, that many of the methods we use with older students simply will not work with little ones.

  5. It is a great idea to put maps on the walls, keep a $20 globe near the dinner table, and just randomly look at and talk about these resources. A child can learn phenomenal amounts about geography just doing this.

  6. Precocious ability in music and art can be encouraged, especially if the parents have a great deal of time and patience, but not guaranteed. Precocious artistry is a different phenomenon from precocious reading and knowledge, which is something available to any child whose parents or caretakers have used appropriate methods.

When children reach school age

  1. A lot of people are opposed to early education simply because early-educated children are different, and for some people, being different is bad–especially when it comes to education and the management of education. If being part of the crowd is important to you, you probably should not engage in early education, because many early-educated children do tend to stand out.

  2. Probably, the best way to leverage the gains made in a successful early education program are in a highly individualized educational program–such as homeschooling.

  3. While I intend to homeschool my children when they reach school age, I respect the constraints other families have that makes this impossible for them.

  4. The mainstream track of mainstream schools typically lack resources to challenge and engage children who have been taught to read, and have otherwise learned a lot, in very early childhood. Parents who are not homeschooling must coordinate carefully and thoughtfully with school districts, schools, and individual teachers, to ensure the best possible educational experience for their children.

From: http://larrysanger.org/2011/04/manifesto/

Bravo, for the most part. The only thing I don’t flat-out agree with is #39, though I don’t have several (or any) sources to back up my feelings, just some blogs and most of the positive testimony from parents on the internet…
39…however, one should not expect small children to be able to understand very much of mathematics from an early age. They may catch on faster later, though.
I thought that the whole point of Doman (and LM) was to teach the ‘understanding’ behind Math to babies and young children…

The rest of the post went down without too much trouble though, bravo to you.

I found this manifesto very good and it is an excellent compendium of what we have been reading in this forum.
Before talking about some of the points I want to add that it would be good to mention the special bonding you obtain with your child.

I agree with mom2bee about understanding math topics by children.

If I understood well:

At number 3 you talk about play and only play in childhood’s life. We have always consider early learning another form of playing. Each time I ask for showing the education bits to my grandson he was so excited as if I told him to play hide and seek or any other game. At the end you mention ‘learning feels like play’ but maybe that can be emphasize more.

At number 13 you say ‘there is nothing wrong with trying to get a child to start on a regimen of learning of some kind’. Shouldn’t it be expressed in a positive way? It is the best thing you can do to start on a regimen…
What do you mean by ‘it requires careful design and forethought, and your approach definitely should depend on the age of the child’. Maybe that may discourage some parents or make them afraid of doing the right thing and in the right way. As you say, paying attention to the child’s reaction and not forcing when they look tired or teaching in a cheerful way isn’t enough to guarantee that you are doing it correctly?

At number 24 and 25 you mention the classics. Can you mention some?

At number 43 to 46 I think I am misguided, maybe you did not ment this but I understood: Early education make child different and to avoid problems in school it is better to homeschool. ‘Parents who are not homeschooling must coordinate carefully…’ Maybe we can have someone share their experience being a non homeschooling parent.

Thanks for the feedback!

My statement re mathematics is very vague. In some ways, I’m sure that Doman and other accelerated math programs might improve math understanding. But, for example, does anyone even claim that babies who can “subitize” the answer to problems like 23+47 actually understand what is going on? A second or third grader, who does the same problem, understands all sorts of things like place value, addition with two digit numbers, etc.

In other words, the mere fact that a child can get the right answer does not mean that the child understands what is going on–any more than, for example, a child who has memorized that Paris is the capital of France really understands what a modern nation state is or what a capital is. Memorizing the fact that Paris is the capital of France is useful for purposes of building the mental scaffolding for later learning, but it would (of course?) be a mistake to think that just because a kid has memorized such facts, he understands the geographical connections that a typical eight year old would, when he memorizes the same fact.

An excellent discussion of the difficulties of introducing math at an early age is in Einstein Never Used Flashcards, which really doesn’t have that much about flashcards and Doman, per se, and instead dwells more on the science of early learning.

Anyway, I’ll have to rewrite that one for increased clarity.

Re #3, I don’t like playing with the language for rhetorical points. The fact that learning can feel like playing doesn’t mean that learning is, literally, playing. There are educational games, which count as playing, but a playful, joyful reading of a book is not, literally speaking, playing.

Re #13, I’m expressing my own opinions and we might disagree in emphasis (but I doubt we disagree much in substance). We follow a sort of regimen in that we rather loosely follow a schedule. “Regimen” has connotations of regimentation, meaning discipline and consistency. Those I don’t advocate, not for little ones.

Re #25, mention classics in the document itself, or now in discussion? For purposes of discussion, there are many lists of classics; see: http://www.google.com/search?q=classic+children’s+books My lists would not be very different from others that people have posted. I would simply leave a few classics (not many) off the list because I don’t really like them for philosophical reasons.

Re the last section, there is a risk that several people have raised in online conversations I’ve followed–that being able to read at a very advanced level by the first years of school will make some kids very bored and turned off to school. Maybe this just reflects my own experience because I was often very bored in school. It might also make some kids, in some circumstances, unpopular or subjects of mean-spirited envy. Some early readers are put a grade, or even two grades, ahead. But there are well-known risks with that practice, too. If there is no downside for some children, that’s great. There are some who say that it simply gives their children an advantage or boost in school, and they didn’t have to work as hard. In any event, homeschooling is one sure way to prevent all of these problems–that’s my point. I assume that’s why there seems to be a higher-than-average rate of homeschooling here on BrillKids.com. (That’s just my impression; I could be wrong, but I don’t think so!)

Daddude, what are your plans with homeschool for H? Are you now or planning to use a specific curriculum? Do you plan to unschool, give a classical education or something else? I would love to hear your plans. Here is Florida we have to take a standardized test each year or have a teacher evaluate the child and provide a letter to the state saying they are on course. Not sure how it works where you are but I was curious if you had a plan because you seem like a planner. :slight_smile:

I would love to hear more about your future curriculum plans, as well!

Yes, I am going to try classical unschooling! :biggrin:

At some point in the next year or two, we’ll start studying “in earnest,” which is not to say that what we do at mealtimes and other times isn’t studying, but all together, it is still a very small amount of H’s time. I’d like to be reading more with him, or doing more math or something, but he resists doing more, and I don’t want to force him (or, not any more than the small amount I occasionally do now).

If H. is not a reluctant learner, and is open to doing something–i.e., he is open to the idea of me giving him a menu to choose from, and then actually studying for a few hours–then that’s basically what I’ll do. I’ll give him a shelffull of books, and a list of other activities, and let him choose what we do and when we do it, as long as we study certain things a certain amount of time every week. For example, I will probably set a minimum of a few hours per week of math. When he wants to do it is up to him.

It might not, and with H. I suspect it won’t, work out that way. If he’s reluctant, or if he is tractable to suggestion but resists making the choices himself (this is now often the case for mealtime reading: he’ll say “yes” to some book, but he won’t choose anything himself), then I’ll make a schedule as we’ve been doing lately for a half-hour or so after breakfast. So for the last few months, we’ve been following a schedule where we do two of these four activities: math, penmanship/writing, memorization, and typing. I try not to go for too long on any of these. He’s perfectly willing to do this, most mornings. More often I just have to get him to focus, as one would most four-year-old boys.

At some point I know that we will try out a full-out unschooling. We’ll drop everything, absolutely everything (except any music or sports lessons we have going), and try out unschooling for a month. Just to see what we can make of it. As you can see, I’m not dogmatic about this stuff. But I don’t expect unschooling to work. H. likes and appreciates books and studying in general, in moderate amounts (except when he’s really into a subject or a book, in which case he can go for a long time). But I don’t think that, left to his own devices, he’d choose what I regard to be essential subjects, such as math and writing. Occasionally he does these things on his own, but over the last six months, he’s done so on average no more than, say, 4-5 days per month for writing, and 2 days per month for math. But who knows–maybe when I say, “From now on, it’s up to you to decide when we do these things,” he’ll get into it much more. I doubt it, though. He’ll probably just want to play with his toys.

A few days ago I gave him an “assignment” and told him to do math and typing by himself, and if he did (work confirmed by Mama), I’d get him a surprise. He did, and I did! So I know he can do this work by himself, it’s just that, well, it’s just not as interesting to him as his toys.

Anyway, I guess you were asking about the specific subjects and how I’d approach them–that’s a much bigger subject and I’m still learning and thinking myself, so I’ll get back to you on that! Suffice it to say that I definitely lean toward classical education, but my own brand of classical education.

DadDude-

I think your son might be too old for this now, but someone gave me a link a while back for an at home preschool classical curriculum. We are still kind of in an early learning hodge-podge curriculum so I haven’t done a whole lot with it yet, but we are getting closer to it. I am thinking I will enroll my DD in preschool and “afterschooling” her for fun (we really enjoy our school time together for the most part) but, we’ll see how it all turns out.

Anyway, I will post the link. H is probably too old? But maybe it will help you or someone else. I will look for it in a few, I printed it out a while ago but I should able to find it on another local forum I am part of.

Here it is. I take it back, I only printed the preschool part, but it goes up higher than that. Maybe it will be of use to it, maybe not. Here ya go!

http://www.classicalcurriculum.com/ModelCurriculum.htm

Dad Dude,
I was missing your interventions in the forum. Now i can see how busy you are. This manifesto is somethink i have to highjlight and read more than once and keep this points in mind when developing our education plans.

Just to round your comments.
Re #3,
Yes,i see it is difficult to draw a line in what ‘playing’ is or learning activity since every experience enriches our knowledge. I undersatnd you refer to ‘formal’ reading, writing or atoher type of teaching/learning activity.

Re #13, We definitely agree. ‘regimen’ was not what i meant but it is good to have a scehdule even with little ones to ensure that you do not missed certain activities inadvertidely but this those not mean that you have to follow the schedule rigurously, especially with babies. It is not critical if you miss certain activities. I think that if you are homeschooling (age 4 or older, with less hours for the younger ones) it is very important to cover all the subjects. As you are planning with H, maybe if not on the date programmed, anytime during the week.

Hope to be heraring more from you.

DadDude, I thought the article was well written and contains many important points. Like the others I also feel that play and learning at an early age is usually the same thing - I am sure your son is learning when playing with his toys too and most children see flashcards or presentations as a toy/play and keep requesting it.

I think with the math that it becomes difficult when you say a young child does not understand. Similarly to when we say children are just memorising words and then come to the definition of reading - I have said before that if they derive meaning from a written word (even if it is just a sign above a shop) then they are reading. With math if they understand that when they count three objects it is a sign of quantity then they have an understanding of math (even if only at its simplest form) and very young children (even babies) can understand quantity as Doman tried to prove.

As for the homeschooling I am not sure I could ever go for unschooling. We are using a more eclectic approach and just doing what works for us. I try to get some reading, writing and arithmetic in every day - she reads a short section, I read plenty to her, we count (the other day she asked to count to 100), do basic sums and play a lot - much of her play at the moment is pretend play and when asked to tell her stories I can incoporate any learning material I feel like into a story or game, and then we do art activities and writing activities which could be as basic as walking out letters in the garden or making them out of play doh to actual pen and paper writing. I try to change things all the time but a certain amount is decided by me and a certain amount is requested by her.

Dear DadDude and others,

I have been trying to figure out why the answer to “Why isn‘t this already common knowledge and practice,” as you succinctly put it. The manifesto is wonderful, and has gone a long way to helping me answer this question. I think your points about egalitarianism, and the experts’ silent treatment, are important parts of the answer.

Another important answer, perhaps, is cognitive blocking by parents who don’t want to feel that they shortchanged their child. This is alluded to in a number of posts to this thread started by Tamsyn.
http://forum.brillkids.com/general-discussion-b5/how-vocal-are-you-about-el-locally/

I was learning about Aaron Swartz in the wake of his tragic death, and I found his blog post on Semmelweis. It seems a concise, direct way of stating the problem. Is the cognitive-blocking explanation too harsh to articulate? Is there a place for “brutal honesty,” to use Aaron’s language, when discussing Early Learning?

I present a shortened version of Swartz’s post below:
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/semmelweis


In the 1840s, hospitals were dangerous places. Mothers who went in to give birth often didn’t make it out. At Vienna’s “First Clinic,” as many as 10% of mothers died of puerperal fever after giving birth.

But at the “Second Clinic,” the number was just 4%. Young doctor Ignaz Semmelweis began desperately searching for an explanation for the difference. In 1847,

Semmelweis’s friend Jakob Kolletschka was performing an autopsy when a student accidentally poked him with a scalpel. Kolletschka got terribly sick and ultimately passed away, with symptoms rather like the what the mothers had. Was some “deathly material” on the corpses responsible for the deaths?

To test this, he insisted the doctors begin washing their hands with chlorinated lime (which he found best removed the stink of death) before handling the pregnant women. The results were shocking. In April 1847, the mortality rate was 18.3%. Semmelweis instituted handwashing in mid-May and by June the mortality rate had crashed to 2.2%. The next month it was even less and later that year it reached zero — for the first time ever.

You’d think doctors would be thrilled by this incredible discovery. Instead, Semmelweis was ridiculed and attacked. He was fired from the hospital and forced out of Vienna. “In published medical works my teachings are either ignored or attacked,” he complained. “The medical faculty at Würzburg awarded a prize to a monograph written in 1859 in which my teachings were rejected.” Even in his native Vienna, hundreds of mothers continued to die every year.

Semmelweis turned to alcohol and his behavior became increasingly erratic. In 1865, he was committed to a mental institution. There he was beaten by the guards, placed in a straitjacket, and locked in a dark cell. He died shortly thereafter, at the age of 47, from an infected wound. Why did doctors so stubbornly reject Ignaz Semmelweis? Well, imagine being told you were responsible for the deaths of thousands of your patients. That you had been killing the people you were supposed to be protecting. That you were so bad at your job that you were actually worse than just giving birth in the street.

We all know people don’t like to hear bad news about themselves. Indeed, we go out of our way to avoid it — and when we do confront it, we try to downplay it or explain it away. We hate hearing bad news about ourselves so much that we’d rather change our behavior than just admit we screwed up

i rekon you have that SPOT ON.
I am quite sure I have half the kids in my kindergarten class because the parents would feel guilty for not offering them a good enough education. EG they know they themselves wont provide it so they pass the reins (and the blame?) to someone else.
Of course teachers that can and regularly do teach a room full of kindy kids how to read believe it is possible and those that havnt ever managed it just say it isnt possible. They wont fight for better education because they fear more work on themselves if the fight is successful. Quite often those that are successful are a lonely voice in a sea of opposition.
At least in this country our govenment is prepared to admit our young children are capable of more…they just dont have anything else to follow that statement as yet…(I’m working on it lol )

Dad Dude:
Receive well deserved homage for contribution.
i have been trying to imagine developing the human computer from two sides:
a biologic side (nature) (hardware)
and an educational side (nurture) (software)

On the biologic side, highly trained individuals are doing a lot of difficult work.
But i have not found much that would teach a mother how to develop a brain.
Can you recommend any such books on the biologic perspective of developing a brain?

From the educational perspective there are some good books
what would be on your list of the best books?

Some of the mothers on this site seem light years ahead of scientists
Does anyone other than Dad Dude have books to recommend?

i would also second what steven said about semmelweiss
we doctors have a good angel and a bad angel, one on each shoulder
we like to think that whatever we do, we get an attaboy from the good angel
it would be quite disconcerting to imagine that the attaboys were actually coming from the bad angel

it is easiest to see the truth when one is no longer personally involved
it is easier for me to see the harms of contraceptives (did he really say that!!!)
or vaccines (now i expect visit from armed federales)
since i don’t do them
Maybe some of what i do do is not so good
there is a truly frightening thought, which i will fight to the death

My wife was the one who did the teaching
so my daughter could read at 3 and son at 2
she sat next to teacher at knights of Columbus dinner
she explained to

My wife was the one who did the teaching
so my daughter could read at 3 and son at 2
she sat next to teacher at knights of Columbus dinner
she explained to teacher my daughter could read
teacher told her they could not really read at that age
that my daughter was merely memorizing words

To me this story is so hilarious i recount it frequently
it shows my wife with no teacher training (she is MD)
knew more about teaching than teacher