I don’t know what benefit reading advanced/adult-level literature would have if a child is taking it in passively. It probably wouldn’t hurt, and it might improve vocabulary, but I’m not sure it would help the child develop a taste for the stuff, because the child isn’t able to understand it, of course. You know, I’m sure you could ask actual reading experts about that, and they would have interesting things to say…I vaguely remember reading supportive comments about this sort of reading in some book(s) I read.
If by “classical literature” you mean classical children’s literature that your child can actually understand (on some level), then FWIW I’m totally in favor of that. I’m absolutely positive that our reading of such stuff has given my boy a taste for more of it, and has also improved his vocabulary.
We started reading chapter books regularly at bedtime just before his third birthday (a year ago). In the time since then, we’ve read the following “children’s classics” (among other chapter books that aren’t exactly “classics,” as well as some easy-to-read adaptations of more advanced literature):
Atwater, Richard. Mr. Popper’s Penguins. 4.9
Collodi, Carlo. Adventures of Pinocchio. 4.2 (twice)
Dalgliesh, Alice. The Bears on Hemlock Mountain. 3.5x.
Gannett, Ruth Stile. My Father’s Dragon. 4.8
Gannett, Ruth Stile. Elmer and the Dragon. 4.7
Gannett, Ruth Stile. The Dragons of Blueland. 4.6
Le Guin, Ursula. Catwings. 4.5
O’Brien, Robert C. Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of Nihm. 5.8 (just finished this last night!)
Stevenson, R. L. A Child’s Garden of Verses.
Warner, Gertrude. Boxcar Children. 3.2
Wilder, Laura I. Little House in the Big Woods. 4.2
White, E.B. Charlotte’s Web. 4.9 (twice)
White, E.B. Stuart Little. 3.9 (think this was our first chapter book)
White, E. B. The Trumpet of the Swan. 5.1 (second time)
(The numbers refer to the grade level; 4.5 means equivalent to halfway through the 4th grade.)
Your child might be different, of course, but I am pretty sure mine wouldn’t have been ready for any of these books when he was just below two years old. We were still doing strictly picture books, although I think we might have been doing Winnie-the-Pooh at the time. But we were always, to a certain extent, “pushing the envelope” in terms of reading level. I mean we weren’t always reading above his head, because that really would turn him off, but we always had a good number of selections available that would “stretch” him.
What has surprised me repeatedly is his taste for advanced stuff out of the blue. It is very hard to predict. For example, a few days ago, we were looking at the books on the bookshelf, and I noticed this stack of Tintin books (remember Tintin? It might be a boy thing) that I had got at a library book sale. I got them something like a year ago, when I knew Henry wouldn’t be interested in them (and he wasn’t, then). But then we got one out the other day, “The Shooting Star,” and lo and behold, he was very curious about it and it held his attention unusually well. We’re almost done with that. Anyway, this is pretty advanced, and I’m very sure that Henry didn’t understand a lot of it, but I explained a lot of things, and asked him a few questions, and he seemed to be getting it. (For example, I asked him where the ship was going, and he said to the Arctic, and then I asked why they were going there, and he said to find the meteorite that crashed there.)
What I do is, I start reading just a few pages of a book to him and see if he likes it. I say, “We’ll read just a little of this, maybe a page, and if you don’t like it, then we’ll stop.” So for every half-dozen books that we try this, he says “yes” to just one, but that is enough for him to keep us going in books that teach him a lot, and which he is interested in. To take another example, just before his third birthday, I happened to get a copy of “Stuart Little” and tried it out on him in this way. I was pretty amazed that he liked it and wanted to read it nightly. This is definitely a book more for 8-12 year olds, and again I am very sure that he didn’t catch a lot of the nuance, and I’m sure he’ll benefit from reading it again when he’s older. But on the other hand, he must have gotten a fair bit out of it because it definitely held his attention.
My notion is that if you continue to “push the envelope” in this way, while of course focusing most of the reading on stuff that is right at the child’s level, then you can make relatively quick progress, if you want to.
The way I figure it, if the child is reading literary classics written for children, and has good experiences with those, then they make a nice stepping stone all the way up to adult literature. He began with Winnie-the-Pooh, and after a year was able to take Stuart Little on board, and lately he again surprised me with his enthusiasm for Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. After this it’s an easy step to The Wizard of Oz, Alice in Wonderland, The Jungle Book, A Wrinkle in Time maybe, and the first couple Harry Potter books. Then after more time and reading, he’ll be ready for Tom Sawyer, Johnny Tremain, the Narnia books, the more advanced Harry Potter books, etc., and after that Watership Down, David Copperfield, Treasure Island. After that it’s really not so much reading and vocabulary level that matter as accessibility of themes. If a kid can like Treasure Island, and get past the maybe archaic-sounding language (it’s archaic-sounding only if you’re not used to reading that), then he’ll soon be plenty prepared to appreciate things like Shakespeare and Austen.