I’ve been pondering how to make this post for at least two weeks now. I can’t really do it all justice in a post, so I’ll just type and give you a few thoughts.
In the last several weeks, I read quite a few books (44 so far in 2014). Three of those recent books that I read have really made my wheels turn and will absolutely have an influence on our post-EL life (when Cub is older).
In no particular order:
- Rafe Esquith’s Teach Like Your Hair is on Fire (hat tip to KristaG on the recommendation)
- Judith Rich Harris’ The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do
- Amy Chua (Tiger Mom) The Triple Package
Each book has its own merits, and yet each complement each other. For instance, Rafe’s book will shatter assumptions you may have about what a disadvantaged (or any for that matter) kid can learn and become passionate about. The book was so inspiring that I watched a documentary that parallels the book called The Hobart Shakespeareans. Trailer can be viewed here: http://www.pbs.org/pov/hobart/ I couldn’t get the video on PBS to load, but the comments are worth a gander. The trailer on YouTube: (the whole documentary might be on YouTube/sometimes they do this legitimately, but I have not searched for it)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1EGzKtR9DE
Some of the book could be implemented into your family or homeschool environment. A lot of it couldn’t though. There are certain group dynamics that he creates. What are the key ingredients? That’s where Harris and Chua’s books come into play. All three dovetail quite nicely.
I’ll give an extremely brief summary here (I cannot do the books justice)
Chua’s Triple Package posits that three characteristics are necessary (though not sufficient) to upward mobility and achievement. The three characteristics are Superiority, Insecurity, and Impulse Control. It’s well argued and made me realize that as of now, I don’t really have a family identity that would fit Chua’s criteria for Superiority (my EL affiliation maybe - but this isn’t an identity that I could necessarily pass onto Cub without a group). That’s where Harris’ book comes in. Her book has been around for nearly two decades now, but for whatever reason, I wasn’t all that familiar with her theory. It went a long way to explaining some dissonance between several ideas and observations that I had lingering for some time. The major theory is that children adapt and adopt (acculturate) to their environment and at school age this means the majority of their adaptations are to fit in with the most significant portion of their life (which is school and their peer group). Her book, along with Chua’s certainly can put Esquith’s remarkable educational accomplishments into perspective. It also made me realize that EL can be easily undermined by the wrong peer group.
After reading these works, I’m now mostly reflecting and wondering how to create a post-EL environment that will nurture the love of learning and the love of excellence/effort, etc.
If anyone has read any of these three books, do you care to comment or chime in with thoughts on the book?
If no one wants to comment, this post can serve as my hearty recommendation for any or all of the three books for any parent that frequents this board - you’ll get something out of them.
:biggrin: